The only issue I've had so far has been name resolution related. After troubleshooting, it appears to be limited to the DSVA itself; it may need to be redeployed. Otherwise, it was a fairly painless installation, and it seems to perform acceptably. Having just dealt with a nasty Malware infection on a Remote Desktop Server where the users executive level suits - no stick available continually log in with multiple admin level accounts and surf this is seriously getting my interest.
In the scenario here I was unable to scrub the bug with their cheap, guest level AV ware, nor the freebie options, and only caught it via Process Explorer. I may have been able to kill it with an offline, guest level scan, but given they are running on some decent VMware infrastructure it sure would have been nice to have attacked from there -vs- spending 8 hours on it and resorting to a week old back-up. Next question - virtual appliances can be real fussy when it comes to DRS.
Do the virtual appliances have to be 'locked' to a specific host? We had major issues with kasperskey on vdi to the point where we had to petty much disable it to stop slowness and other weird issues like thin apps not compiling.
Wudan Master wrote: We had major issues with kasperskey on vdi to the point where we had to petty much disable it to stop slowness and other weird issues like thin apps not compiling. This uses a dedicates scan server and scanning is done over the network. In my humble opinion, hypervisor level AV is overkill and complicates things. Stick to using guest OS AV. I guess if I had a large View environment I may think differently, but outside of that, I wouldn't deploy hypervisor AV.
KennethAndersenDK wrote: Wudan Master wrote: We had major issues with kasperskey on vdi to the point where we had to petty much disable it to stop slowness and other weird issues like thin apps not compiling.
Vshield endpoint. We had major performance degradation when we started using MOVE with agent. This was in a TS environment and caused our login times to become an order magnitude slower.
We never quite got around to trying out MOVE agentless. Hamstro wrote: oakfan52 wrote: Wudan Master wrote: We had major issues with kasperskey on vdi to the point where we had to petty much disable it to stop slowness and other weird issues like thin apps not compiling. Any ideas why that might be? Did you have the same exclusion policies applied to the move agent systems? Agentless doesn't currently support hyper-v. Yes, the same policies were applied. We opened a ticket with McAfee for the problem but received no useful answers.
The offload servers did not show too high load when we saw the problems and we haven't yet had the time to investigate further, unfortunately. I'd have to say it all depends on how it is implemented by Symantec and others.
If VMWare r Broadcom Employee. Migration User. Posted May 15, PM. Reply Reply Privately Options Dropdown. Posted Jun 01, AM. We are currently investigating feasibility across both security effectiveness and run-time performance, and working closely with VMware to deliver a solution. Posted Jul 15, AM. The latest SEP client is leaner than ever, but when you mulitply that by number of running on one host you definitely notice it.
Real-time protection not so bad, but you'll definitely see very busy ESX hosts when your clients start running scheduled scans. A person could mitigate that performance hit by applying different scanning schedules to different VMs, but that's a lot of extra management especially when DRS will be moving those VMs and possibly screwing up your schedules.
Posted Aug 03, AM. In large environments a good management and reporting solution is a key component to survive. Symantec did a good step forward with the introduction of SEPM, it would be a shame to not use it for other AV products.
Posted Sep 07, AM. But, first of all, when a beta will be available for evaluation purpose by customer. Posted Jan 25, PM. This thread was started 8 months ago and I haven't seen or heard anything from Symantec other than this and a search doesn't turn up anything either.
As far as what I would like to see it do, the same things everyone else is doing. With the help of McAfee AntiVirus, you can now remove confidential files for good. It shreds files so that no one can recover them. It improves privacy and prevents identity theft. When you visit a website, it may insert cookies in your system. Through these cookies, they can track your online behavior and use this information to improve your online experience. However, these cookies also affect your privacy.
This application looks for cookies and trackers in your hard disk and gets rid of them with just a single mouse-click. You can also keep an eye on your network and protect devices of your entire family. McAfee AntiVirus monitors incoming and outgoing traffic to protect your PC from viruses, spyware, Trojans, and other malware.
If it detects harmful content, it alerts you and quarantines the file to prevent further damage. As the name suggests, McAfee AntiVirus is a great antimalware application. It detects and removes files that may contain harmful content at your approval. It reduces the risk of hacking attacks and allows you to schedule scans for efficient performance. Leave a Reply Cancel reply You must be logged in to post a comment. This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible.
0コメント